|
Making Pigs Fly |
|||
|
Peter de Jager is a provocative Speaker, Writer and Consultant. His primary focus in on how we manage change, technology and the future. In addition to speaking at conferences worldwide, he also writes monthly columns for CIO Magazine and Computerworld Canada. His goal is always to question what we think is so, and in so doing perhaps open up new opportunities. If you'd like permission to reprint any of Peter's articles, please contact him directly. You can contact him at |
You’ll
see it when you believe it!
--- that might sound like a snippet from some corny motivational keynote
presentation, but never-the-less it contains more than just a few grains
of truth. Sometimes building the future requires nothing more than simply
believing it will happen. It’s called a self fulfilling prophecy or the
Pygmalion effect. Perhaps
the best example is a run on a bank. If enough people believe a bank is
going to fail, then it fails. A bank is a fragile economical balancing
act; supported primarily by the blind trust of the depositors. Remove that
trust and it collapses under the weight of massed withdrawal slips. To bring
down a modern bank, all you need is a willing partner in the global media.
A few well planted contradictory rumors, a earful of sound bites, a video
clip of a crowd of people storming a bank… and of course, a handful of
less than convincing denials from bank and government officials, and you
have the makings of a financial disaster. Start the campaign at the
beginning of the weekend, let boil until the opening bell on Monday; sit
back and watch the future unfold. Of
course, if you can make things fall, you can also make things fly. The
DOT.CON fiasco was an example of far too many people believing that there
was an easy way to get rich. The result? Stock prices soar for a while,
and then finally the bubble bursts. If you got out early then you cleaned
up. If you got out late then you got cleaned out. The
DOT.CON example is a good one, not because it is a good example of a self
fulfilling prophecy, but because its failure highlights the internal
details of how a self fulfilling prophecy works. The behavior of the
believers must create a positive e.g. If
you believed the DOT.CON prophecy of a new economy (money out of nothing)
then you could drive the stock
prices through the roof, but that behavior could not by itself, generate
the prophesied profits. Sooner or later there’s no one willing to pay
more for the stock than you paid for it because the companies aren’t
making what they said they would… and the prices start to fall. Better
examples of positive self fulfilling prophecies are those explored in 1957
by Robert
Merton a professor of sociology at Columbia University. In his book 'Social
Theory and Social Structure ', he explained how when teachers were
told that a particular set of students had a high IQ, they were treated as
‘good students’ and their marks increased. When the teachers were told
that other students had low IQ, then their marks decreased. In both
cases, the teachers modified their behavior towards the students. They
praised the ‘good’ ones and did not ‘waste time’ with those with
the alleged low IQs. Those who were praised naturally did their best to
repeat the praise, and those who had less teacher attention did not learn
as well. Merton said the
phenomenon occurs when "a false definition of the situation evokes a
new behavior which makes the original false conception come true." Of
course, there’s a flip side to all of this. Equally valid is the concept
of a self defeating prophecy. A prediction that ensures, by the behavior
it generates, it will not come true. The strident cry of, “Johnny! Stop
running with that stick in your hand, or you’ll put your eye out!” is
familiar to any child, or parent. At first glance, the purpose of the
warning is to make you believe that running with sharp sticks will have
dire consequences. The intent however is to get you to stop running… and
to avoid the consequences. It’s all a matter of belief. Self fulfilling prophecies are both handy tools and insidious traps. Used properly, the self reinforcing behavioral loops can generate desirable results, but those same loops can keep a person with depression from getting out of bed in the morning… and the next morning and the one after that. We inadvertently create the futures we believe are predestined. © 2003, Peter de Jager. Reprinted
from - Voyageur Science Fiction Magazine
|
||
| Return to Technobility.com | |||