Is "Change Management" a Misnomer?

 

 


Peter de Jager is a provocative Speaker, Writer and Consultant. His primary focus in on how we manage change, technology and the future.

In addition to speaking at conferences worldwide, he also writes monthly columns for CIO Magazine and Computerworld Canada.

His goal is always to question what we think is so, and in so doing perhaps open up new opportunities.

If you'd like permission to reprint any of Peter's articles, please contact him directly.

You can contact him at
pdejager@technobility.com

Or sign the Guest Book and he'll get back to you. 

                                                        
To many people, the notion we can "Manage" change with any noticeable positive effect, is a myth perpetrated on naοve organizations by greedy, unscrupulous consultants. In general, that's a tad overstated, but I've heard people describe the concept of "Change Management" in even less complimentary terms.

Part of Change Management's image problems relate to the very label we've attached to the process, and far too much fuzzy thinking on the subject. Here are some possible terms we might use as replacements; Problem Solving, Leadership, Innovation, Making Progress, Implementation, Transition Management and Process Improvement.

Unfortunately, while each of those terms addresses some aspects of Change Management, they each present their own problems of perception and suitability;

Problem Solving :- The task of managing change does indeed involve a large degree of problem solving ability, but it is a very specific type of problem and all types of Change have many process patterns in common. If we dump change management into the larger bucket of problems, then it becomes more difficult to focus on, and benefit from, those patterns.

Leadership :- Great concept. Making change happen smoothly, quickly and with a minimum of pain, definitely requires leadership ability. Unfortunately the term "Leadership" suggests the need for abilities beyond the reach of the majority of employees. Most people do not consider themselves leaders, and placing Change Management into that category means that we then tend to place the responsibility for Change into the hands of "THEM"... Hardly the best approach when an organization is attempting to undergo large scale Change.

Innovation :- A good start, but Managing Change is more than just coming up with a new idea, it's also, perhaps mostly about preparing people for the Change and assisting them through the assimilation of the new skills/situation/environment.

Making Progress/Process Improvement: - Also a great start... but not all Change involves "Making Progress" or "Improvement", a lot of Change is about getting used to a situation that is not as good as what went before.

Implementation/Transition Management :-  Like "Innovation" above, this is only part of the process. Implementation without preparation doesn't get the real job done.

As mentioned at the start, the term "Change Management" has its own problems, at the very least it causes the eyes of most managers to glaze over. That said it is still the most common way to refer to the task of managing the change process from start to finish.

To clarify what is involved in Managing Change we can break the process into five stages.

          – Awareness that the Status Quo is no longer sufficient/appropriate/desirable.

      II    – Accepting that a specific change is necessary

     III   – The Change 'event'

     IV   – The transition period where we acquire new skills and comfort level

      V   – Achievement of the new Status Quo

Stage one is less one of management and more of being observant of what is happening around us. Management's role is to notice the early indicators and weak signals hinting that a change is called for

Stage two draws on all our management and leadership ability. The more people come to believe that the change is necessary, the easier the change process. "Telling" them what to believe isn't the answer. Describing the problem, creating a vision of the future, allowing them to contribute to the details of what the solution might be, these all combine to create a ground swell of demand, support and commitment to the Change.

Stage three is an event in time. The move takes place, the layoffs happen, the new system is made live. Getting the operational details to go as smoothly as possible, through good management practices, adds to the ease with which the change is assimilated.

Stage four is all about providing a support structure to facilitate the acquisition of new skills. Without this support structure in place, change becomes unnecessarily difficult.

Stage five? Three words - Time to Celebrate.

So? Does the concept of Change Management make sense? If these five stages are ignored or mismanaged then change is naturally difficult... if attention is paid, if management is competent in discharging the above duties and responsibilities, then Change can occur with less pain. Change Management, done properly, does far more than result in a positive outcome, it enables your organization to thrive in the face of adversity.

© 2005, Peter de Jager – Peter is passionate about change, how it affects both individuals and organizations and allows them to grow and prosper. To contact him, and host internal seminars on Change Management visit www.technobility.com

For reprint permissions click here
  break line

 

Resources:

Change Management

IT Management

Looking to the Future

Technological Implications

Soft Skills

 

 




Return to Technobility.com